<config>="[<][<dpt>:]<mainGA>[[+[<]<listeningGA>]+[<]<listeningGA>..]]"
That means “<” stands in front of DPT.
But in examples the DPT is in front of “<”:
ga="1.019:<5/1/2"
ga="9.001:<5/0/0"
Even it’s possible the docs should be more exact.
<config>="[<][<dpt>:]<mainGA>[[+[<]<listeningGA>]+[<]<listeningGA>..]]"
That means “<” stands in front of DPT.
But in examples the DPT is in front of “<”:
ga="1.019:<5/1/2"
ga="9.001:<5/0/0"
Even it’s possible the docs should be more exact.
The definition of the Group Address Notation in README.md seems to be wrong.
This works for me:
Type datetime : Date1 "Alarm" [ ga="11.001:<1/5/24" ]
But this doesn’t:
Type datetime : Date1 "Alarm" [ ga="<11.001:1/5/24" ]
So ‘<’ must come after the dpt.
<config>="[<dpt>:][<]<mainGA>[[+[<]<listeningGA>]+[<]<listeningGA>..]]"
Norbert, it should definitely be the other way around, i.e. <[DPT]:[GA]. As some people have reported, the binding is not honoring the DPTs, so this might be an artefact.