Isnt persistence only for data which i want to store? I mean, this rule and these items no matter if persisted should be populated by minmax or am wrong? isnt this function just compare data stored in the variable and if bigger/lower then update?
those three test items are not persisted anywhere, but normal “not testing” ones are via:
Strategies {
everyMinute : "0 * * * * ?"
every5Minutes : "0 */5 * * * ?"
every10Minutes : "0 */10 * * * ?"
everyHour : "0 0 * * * ?"
everyDay : "0 0 0 * * ?"
default = everyChange
}
Items {
gStoreData : strategy = everyChange, everyDay, restoreOnStartup
gStoreWeather : strategy = every10Minutes, restoreOnStartup
}
and indeed there is a group gStoreWeater and gStoreData which contains non-testing humidity (which are faulty as well, that’s why i have created those testing ones)
And I’m using JDBC MariaDB connection. Which if Iam thinking about it might be an issue as i was using mysql persistence before and it worked. But then I’ve read some post that jdb persistence is more stable, hmmm
btw, even out group of which stores data in rules it’s doing something
2019-06-21 21:13:53.610 [WARN ] [jdbc.internal.JdbcPersistenceService] - JDBC::query: try to generate the table for item 'testHumidity'