Many thanks for your valuable comments!
If I read this former comment from you and this part of the documentation, then my understanding is:
- sendCommand(x) sends a command and the according binding acts on this by sending it to the device
- Here I don’t have a binding, but just a pure item. Therefore the autoupdate gets for sure involved and updates the item’s state.
But one question:
Can I expect in a rule fired by “received update” in this scenario, that the item’s state is for sure set to the value which I sent via sendCommand?
Or is the same true, which is documented in the link above for rules fired by “received command”: Means it may happen, that the rule is triggered before the item’s state is updated!