Rules and return codes

[florian-h05 (Florian H.)]

@Nadahar

That’s what I mean by “implicit return”. It looks like the expression without the wrapper is written so that the result of the expression is automatically returned..?

I basically answered by question below where I asked it, I can imagine how this works …

@Nadahar

There’s still a lot of complexity to handle here, because even if you assume that everybody from 5.1 have this enabled, you must have two versions of the rule templates, one for > 5.1 and one for >= 5.1.

I the wrapper is only applied for actions, then we can avoid this situation.

@Nadahar

What about something as crude as simply erasing the return statement from the script if the wrapper is not enabled before processing? That way, one could use return in the script itself, and it should work either way? It would still mean incompatibility between before 5.1 and not though.

That‘s also quite hacky …

@JustinG

Is there a reason the wrapper has to be a global configuration instead of being an option on individual rules?

There is no way of adding add-on specific config to rules.