setImage action not available/not recognized

Setup, Configuration and Use Scripts & Rules
1

I am using OH5.2 with textual DSL.

In the docs there is an action described:

setImage(String itemName, String url, int timeout)

But I am unable to get this to work. I get this error in the logs:

Script execution of rule with UID ‘testbutton-1’ failed: The name ‘setImage’ cannot be resolved to an item or type

Is this action not available anymore? What are the alternatives?

Mij goal is to send a notification inclusing an image that also works remote. The source of the image is only local available to OH.

2

I do not find any reference to a setImage action anywhere in the docs. Can you point out where you find this?

Setting the image of a notification isn’t going to be a stand alone action. It will be a method or argument on something else.

The docs for sendNotification says

sendNotification(emailAddress, message, icon, tag, title, referenceId, onClickAction, mediaAttachmentUrl, actionButton1, actionButton2, actionButton3)

It’s an argument, not a separate function call.

3

Its relativ new: Actions | openHAB

:melting_face:

1 Like
4

It was implemented partially so that it is not available in DSL rule.

You are welcome to create an issue in core repo and I will add support for DSL rule.

Edit: I am not sure now that something is really missing. By the way, there is probably something wrong somewhere.

6

I saw Dan referenced the action like

actions.HTTP.setImage("Apartment_Camera_Snapshot", "http://camera.local/camera-snapshot.jpg");

https://community.openhab.org/t/sendnotification-with-image-does-not-work-remotely-in-ios-app/168090/2?u=gevasta

Not tested it yet.

7

That is something new ? I never used that syntax to call a core action.

Is it DSL code or JSScripting?

I am now afraid if any core action is still working in DSL

I will have to test some of them to check.

8

I tested this syntax in Rules DSL and it does not work.

Dan responded in the other thread.

9

That JS Scripting, not Rules DSL.

10

Dan suggested new syntax as written in the docs, does not work either.