Shelly Binding

[Larsen (Locke)]

everything seems to be running fine so far with the new build and some
Shelly Plus1, 1PM, 2PM, PlugS, TRV
Thank you so much for all your effort.

[milo (M)]

@Larsen do you even have the energy channels and voltage channels available on the Shelly 1 plus pm?

[Baschtlwaschtl (Sebastian)]

I’m on openhab 5.1.4 with dev 5.2.0.202605011258

No errors so far.

Greets

[scheuerer]

Hello. I can confirm, that I have had and still have on all my plus 1PM the energy / power as well as the voltage channel active and running.

All fine so far…

All Things, items were created with 4.x a long time ago…
My PI5 runs with latest OpenHabian 5.1.4, and latest noOpenHAB patches

BTW: Thanks for the tipp with DO NOT UPDATE the shellys to 2.0.0 Beta-1

[milo (M)]

@Baschtlwaschtl

5.2.0.202605011258

but i don’t see it

5.2.0.202605030737

and OH5.2 snapshot

[scheuerer]

• What happens, when you click the Thing properties.
• Is you model supported by the binding and ID’s (check documention for supported models)

• Delete the thing and all belonging items (channels) and create them new, automaticly or manual.

[milo (M)]

so here its is

* SNSW-001P16EU

if you delet it and add them sometime the voltage channels and enery channels appears sometime not

[scheuerer]

Have you tried,

• OH service stopped
• ZRAM stopped
• cleaned cache?

And started ZRAM
And started OH

[milo (M)]

Deleted the cache stopped everything deleted the cache reloaded and rebooted same behavior

[Nadahar (Nadar)]

I’d really wish that clearing the cache wasn’t one of those “when everything else fails” gotos… it’s very rarely useful. It’s not the data that are cached, it’s the bundles (parts of OH itself). Clearing it only helps if there’s anything wrong with your bundles/installed components, your data are unaffected by a cache clearing.

[scheuerer]

I"m puzzled now, and have no other idea anymore.

What would be, if you install a new fresh OH with the DEV binding and install the Shelly 1 PM plus?

[milo (M)]

Same behaviour…I don’t know does it help to get some logs?

[markus7017 (Markus Michels)]

I updated the DEV build, could you please verify. Config handling for device address (IP/FQDN/BD) has been changed. That should be the final check before merging.

I’ll the move to the meter issues, saw already 2 bugs

[alaub81 (Andreas)]

up and running.

what do you exactly mean with:

Config handling for device address (IP/FQDN/BD) has been changed

Where do we have to check if this is working?

[Nadahar (Nadar)]

@alaub81

Where do we have to check if this is working?

If the devices are online, it’s “working”. But, the change only matters if you use names, not IP addresses when you configure the devices. To use names, you must have some kind of name resolution system set up on your local network, so it won’t be viable for many users to test this.

[scheuerer]

All fine. No issuses seen so far with 5.2.0.202605080611

[alaub81 (Andreas)]

same here after more than 24h! It is nice to see the binding so stable

[ErikDB (Erik)]

openhab> bundle:list | grep -i shelly
368 │ Active │  80 │ 5.2.0.202605080611    │ openHAB Add-ons :: Bundles :: Shelly Binding

Running it since 9/5, and no issues yet.

[Harald_Pott]

After approx. two days I am here with the Smoke Sensors:

With the binding:

Rest of the devices or online and working.

[alaub81 (Andreas)]

I have 2 smoke sensors, too. All good on my side. Perhaps check if the correct outbound web socket connection is set on the devices.