Support for ZWave controller SD3503 (ZM5304)

Add-ons Bindings
1

Greetings,

I recently tried running the zwave binding on top of the aforementioned SoC but ran into the inability to add ZWave devices to the network due to a recurring error:

2016-08-24 17:50:15,586 | ERROR | ZWaveInputThread | ZWaveCommandProcessor            | 234 - org.openhab.binding.zwave - 2.0.0.201607240102 | Command processor error
2016-08-24 17:50:15,590 | WARN  | ZWaveInputThread | ZWaveController                  | 234 - org.openhab.binding.zwave - 2.0.0.201607240102 | TODO: Implement processing of Request M
essage = -- (0xA8)

A basic brochure of the controller can be found here.
I also tried adding devices using open-zwave but got an error with a strangely similar looking TODO message:

2016-08-24 17:57:46.923 Info, **TODO: handle request for 0xa8** Please report this message.
2016-08-24 17:57:56.887 Error, Node005, ERROR: Dropping command, expected response not received after 1 attempt(s)

Is it to be currently considered unsupported by both projects?

2

New devices may support new features, but that should not prevent support for standard functionality.

Please provide a logfile so I can see what is happening.

3

Here it is: pastebin.
I tried adding a Fibaro FGMS-001 device. The node is added to the network, but then identification fails.
I started from a clean condition (controller reset, all userdata/ wiped).

4

Thanks. I can probably decode this - it looks like an enhanced version of one of the other messages so I can likely do something to get past the initial error. The big question is if I do that, what happens next (ie if there are further changes required).

It’s probably something that would need a bit of effort to look at (unfortunately), but it is likely solvable with some time.

5

Thanks for your answer chris.
Meanwhile, someone from the openzwave team answered on the same issue here, basically saying that it is a message from the SerialAPI-level of the protocol, which is lower than Command Classes.
Hope we can get to something by joining efforts

6

I don’t agree with that statement. As I said earlier, I can decode this message.

I don’t have this device, so I can’t really do too much to help. It would take a little bit of time but from what I’ve seen, at least this message that you posted earlier could be decoded.