Hi,
can someone please clarify if this is normal and is intended that way.
I prefer textbased configuration, so i added the 3 things related to my bridge to my fritzbox. it works fine and i’m little annoyed that in THINGS the INBOX is showing the three THINGS i already added successfully (as they are all ONLINE).
Is there no correlation? How to get rid if at all?
Thanks a lot Norbert
cweitkamp
(Christoph Weitkamp)
June 27, 2021, 8:36am
3
I can confirm your findings. The TR064 binding does not define representation properties for the things and thus the Inbox cannot sort duplicate entities for it.
//Edit
openhab:main
← openhab:cweitkamp-patch-1
opened 08:41AM - 27 Jun 21 UTC
- Added representation property for Things
See https://community.openhab.org/… t/tr-064-binding-inbox-notification-after-manual-adding-fritzbox/123977
Signed-off-by: Christoph Weitkamp <github@christophweitkamp.de>
<!--
Thanks for contributing to the openHAB project!
Please describe the goal and effect of your PR here.
Pay attention to the below notes and to *the guidelines* for this repository.
Feel free to delete any comment sections in the template (starting with "<!--").
-->
<!--
Please provide a PR summary in the *Title* above, according to the following schema:
- If related to one specific add-on: Mention the add-on shortname in square brackets
e.g. "[exec]", "[netatmo]" or "[tesla]"
- If the PR is work in progress: Add "[WIP]"
- Give a short meaningful description in imperative mood
e.g. "Add support for device XYZ" or "Fix wrongly handled exception"
for a new add-on/binding: "Initial contribution"
Examples:
- "[homematic] Improve communication with weak signal devices"
- "[timemachine][WIP] Initial contribution"
- "Update contribution guidelines on new signing rules"
-->
<!--
Please give a few sentences describing the overall goals of the pull request.
Give enough details to make the improvement and changes of the PR understandable
to both developers and tech-savy users.
Please keep the following in mind:
- What is the classification of the PR, e.g. Bugfix, Improvement, Novel Addition, ... ?
- Did you describe the PRs motivation and goal?
- Did you provide a link to any prior discussion, e.g. an issue or community forum thread?
- Did you describe new features for the end user?
- Did you describe any noteworthy changes in usage for the end user?
- Was the documentation updated accordingly, e.g. the add-on README?
- Does your contribution follow the coding guidelines:
https://www.openhab.org/docs/developer/guidelines.html
- Did you check for any (relevant) issues from the static code analysis:
https://www.openhab.org/docs/developer/bindings/#include-the-binding-in-the-build
- Did you sign-off your work:
https://www.openhab.org/docs/developer/contributing.html#sign-your-work
-->
<!--
Your Pull Request will automatically be built and available under the following folder:
https://openhab.jfrog.io/openhab/libs-pullrequest-local/org/openhab/
It is a good practice to add a URL to your built JAR in this Pull Request description,
so it is easier for the community to test your Add-on.
If your Pull Request contains a new binding, it will likely take some time
before it is reviewed and processed by maintainers.
That said, consider submitting your Add-on in the Eclipse IoT Marketplace
See this thread for more info:
https://community.openhab.org/t/24491
Don't forget to submit a thread about your Add-on in the openHAB community:
https://community.openhab.org/c/add-ons
-->
1 Like
i’m not sure if its only me and it was pure luck but after the long awaited Testing update of openhab now the inbox notification is gone. so maybe this has been “fixed” - if it should be seen as a bug at all. Kind Regards,
Norbert
EDIT: ah i see, property has been added. NICE!
system
(system)
Closed
August 8, 2021, 10:49pm
5
This topic was automatically closed 41 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.