I found this thread, saw the database links above, created an account and opened a ticket on cd-jackson.com, now just waiting for @chris to let me in, please.
Working on it. Not easy (it’s my first time) but doing my best.
I’m afraid I’ve made a bit of a mess of things, though.
I mistakenly modified the channel list on device #115. Please disregard this edit.
I also mistakenly added a new device #1055 when in fact device #244 already existed with different IDs. I don’t know how I didn’t find it the first time, because I did search… I thought I did, anyway. Please delete device #1055. Sorry for the mess, I’ll get the hang of this eventually.
Anyway. I can’t seem to delete things when I’ve added something by mistake, nor can I seem to cancel a request. Might be a privilege issue.
I’m seeing a red exclamation point on parameter 255 (which I added), with no explanation or tooltip or other error message. 255 is correct – it’s listed as FF in the manual, I tried making it FF in the device list but it came out as 0, so I the field must be decimal, not hexadecimal.
Anyway… phew. I’ve made my submission now, device #244.
Please delete device #1055, I did not mean to add it.
Please also disregard the change to #115.
Will now try to add the updated device into openhab manually, hopefully that is a thing.
Alright, I will wait patiently for an update, and add my device back to Fibaro HC2 in the mean time, since I really need the ventilation system automation to work.
Here we go, that wasn’t so bad.
Fibaro HC2 LUA scene (script) to feed a parameter from a Z-Wave device (in this case id 301) directly to OpenHAB through the REST API.
@chris could you take a quick look, please? Existing database entry is a non plus zwave device, @leif 's device is a zwave plus device (firmware version 2.3), should we separate the two devices in the database (I have some spare time today to do that).
Correct, database users with normal access rights can only add and edit entries, not delete them.
It’s hard to tell how best to handle this. There are two options -:
The devices are the same, but the original device wasn’t properly filled in - possibly because manufacturer data was inadequate.
The devices are actually different.
I found a newer manual which still doesn’t mention the configuration command class, but does list config parameters.
I also tried to find this device in the zwave alliance database, but couldn’t.
Given that the new manual specifically mentions ZWave Plus Technology, where the old one only says ZWave Technology, they are probably different, and probably it’s therefore best to split them.
Ah wow! Nice attention to detail there @sihui, I didn’t think to compare the manuals, especially since the devices are identical externally. I saw that the command class was missing, but I actually assumed that the original poster had been lazy and deleted the command class (to get rid of the database warning that there’s a command class but no defined commands) rather than fill out the commands! My bad.
So, it looks like I added a whole bunch of information to 244 which really only applies to #1055 then.
Do you need me to do anything else or will you take it from here?
@chris, I checked the manual you linked to and found the following on page 5:
I seem to have caused confusion - sorry. I didn’t mean to infer that it was not supported. Clearly the device supports the configuration command class as the manual lists the configuration parameters.
My point was simply that the configuration command class is not listed in EITHER manual. However, in the newer manual the config parameters ARE listed. Clearly this means that the newer device supports configuration command class, but it still doesn’t prove that the older device didn’t support the parameters. It’s not uncommon for Chinese manufacturers to have really crappy manuals that don’t list configuration parameters. It’s just not possible to say from the information we have.
Interestingly, there is another device with the same issue… Myself and @TimScottz8 have been discussing off list the MCO MH8-FC. This seems to have done the same thing - ie there is a newer version that is ZWave Plus, and contains similar parameters to the PM2.5 we were discussing earlier.
Currently Tim has updated the old database entry, but I think we probably should take the same approach as we did above with the PM2.5 as the version Tim has is the Plus version -:
Added a comment to this post as reference, omitted the “Export” this time
As I don’t know the device type and id you were talking about I added them all, please remove if necessary.