I completely understand and respect that. After all Willow isn’t exactly a money printing machine either (total income: $0). I only mention HA because as seen from this discussion the user takeaway from the Willow and OpenHAB experience is “Willow can’t do that”. We can and do support “that” but of course we’re inherently limited by the communication with the platform on the other side.
This is in no way intended to be critical of OpenHAB - I’ve had open source projects for 20 years. If anyone gets it, it’s me. I just want to be clear that if/when OH does support any of this it’s likely a few lines of code in our OpenHAB endpoint for us to support it.
There are plenty of other things we can do that HA doesn’t support either. For example, we’re working on a hybrid fuzzy and semantic search autocorrection implementation for voice commands. Nothing else out there in the space has a remote concept of this so we’re having to work around it all over the place. The good news for OH users is we settled on a mechanism to support this that is common-denominator and will work across all supported command endpoints. Anyway, just an example - that’s APIs for you.
We’re a tiny team (three people part time) and essentially brand new open source project - this reads exactly like what I write almost every day when our users ask for stuff that’s way out there . The problem with giving people everything is even when you do that they just want more.