EspMilightHub new binding for milight limitlessLED and easybulb

First of all, thanks for this great binding. It was very easy to setup. There is only 1 thing I haven’t figured out yet:

I’m trying to adjust the color through a rule. I use this code in my rule:

Milight_ID0x2_G1_Cmd.sendCommand("100,356,100")
Milight_ID0x2_G1_SndCmd.sendCommand(ON)

My items:

Switch Milight_ID0x2_G1_State     "Light On/Off"           {channel="espmilighthub:rgb_cct:Auto001:0x21:level"}
Dimmer Milight_ID0x2_G1_Level     "0x005"                  {channel="espmilighthub:rgb_cct:Auto001:0x21:level"}
Dimmer Milight_ID0x2_G1_CTemp     "White Color Temp"       {channel="espmilighthub:rgb_cct:Auto001:0x21:colourtemperature"}
Color  Milight_ID0x2_G1_Hue    "Color" ["Lighting"]        {channel="espmilighthub:rgb_cct:Auto001:0x21:colour"}
Number Milight_ID0x2_G1_Mode    "Discomode"                {channel="espmilighthub:rgb_cct:Auto001:0x21:discomode"}
String Milight_ID0x2_G1_Cmd 	    "Command to Send"      {channel="espmilighthub:rgb_cct:Auto001:0x21:bulbcommand"}
Switch Milight_ID0x2_G1_SndCmd    "Send Command" 		   {channel="espmilighthub:rgb_cct:Auto001:0x21:sendbulbcommand"}

When I set a color through the sitemap I see this in the log:

milight/commands/0x2/rgb_cct/1 {"state":"ON","level":100,"hue":2,"saturation":95}
milight/states/0x2/rgb_cct/1 {"state":"ON","level":100,"hue":1,"saturation":95,"bulb_mode":"color"}

When my rules gets executed:

milight/commands/0x2/rgb_cct/1 {"command":"100,100,356"}

What am I doing wrong?

EDIT: OK, after a good night sleep and reading through the topic from the previous version of this binding, I think the command should be more like this:

`Milight_ID0x2_G1_Cmd.sendCommand('{"state":"ON","level":100,"hue":1,"saturation":5,"bulb_mode":"color"}')`

Logs:

milight/commands/0x2/rgb_cct/1 {"command":"{"state":"ON","level":100,"hue":1,"saturation":5,"bulb_mode":"color"}"}
milight/commands/0x2/rgb_cct/1 {"command":"{"state":"ON","level":100,"hue":1,"saturation":5,"bulb_mode":"color"}"}

How do I send only the state to an item instead of a command with the state??