Linkable widget should contain either only frames or none at all

Setup, Configuration and Use Items & Sitemaps
1

Hello!
I’m migrating my openHAB 1.8 to 2.2

Could you help me to detect this message appeared after the migration?

2018-03-14 17:01:44.775 [INFO ] [el.core.internal.ModelRepositoryImpl]:
Validation issues found in configuration model 'home.sitemap', using it anyway:
Linkable widget should contain either only frames or none at all

Thank you!

2

Post your sitemap please.

Linkable widget should contain either only frames or none at all

3

Have you already migrated 1.8 to 2.0 and received this message?

4

Thats not only an error getting after migration.

5

The sitemap is too complex to post here…
Please show me an example of this problem.
Thanks!

6

https://www.google.de/search?q=should+contain+either+only+frames+or+none+at+all

7

Thanks, but I know google…

Your profile report:

  • Joined : 3 days
  • Trust Level basic user

…please ignore my post.

Someone who can help me?
Thank you!

8

I think it’s a bug in the validator, the sitemaps work just fine, and i don’t see any reason why everything should be wrapped in frames.

I just ignore these messages, annoying as they are.

9

Thanks Nicholas,

i stumbled upon the same bug now - just having couple of frames in the sitemap for having the right structure and visibility to different items.

will ignore them but in anyway would be nice getting a fix sometime.

Thanks,

10

I’m seeing these too and my original site map is 2+. Any insight into what is causing these errors?

11

It’s a problem in your sitemap structure. I believe it’s to do with the way things are nested.

Frame label="top frame" {
   Text label="linkable widget, click for more" {
      Text item=someItem label="this is fine on its own"
       Frame label="but not allowed to mix frames and others on one 'level'" {
            Text item=otherItem label="so this is broken"
       }
   }
}
2 Likes
12

Thank you for the details! I do have these structures exactly as you described. I was using the DSC Binding example, but I think it was my edits which caused the problem.