openHAB core is still meant to be used for solutions that build on top of it, it’s the same situation as before with ESH. But neither openHAB, nor open, nor HAB need to be in a sitemap-replacing name, does it? We can be more creative that that.
So far we have:
HABdasH
home (unfortunately disqualified, because that is reserved already)
omp (functionality not obviously related to a “sitemap”)
controller (functionality not obviously related to a “sitemap”)
I think its important to choose a name which is pretty unique when used in the forum search. View, Layout, Dashboard, Board, Controller, Panel, etc. will for sure return hundreds of results which are totally unrelated to a ‘sitemap2’ related query. Even my suggestion of Blueprint already returns approx. 15 results which are totally unrelated to a sitemap2.
We got several places where uuid is a used term.
Many of the openhab cloud topics may contain some posts a bout it. https://community.openhab.org/search?q=uui returns already in 100+ results.
I don’t understand why “Ideally the name openHAB (or parts of it) does not appear in your suggestion.”
Having a name relating to openhab, makes it much more unique on the internet. all names now, will result into many google searches not related to openhab.
My understanding is this is only about how to name grouping a set of things, not the name of a new UI. So I think a name that best reflect the concept to as many people as possible should be choosen so people easily can understand the concept. Differentiation can be done with UI naming.