Hi Chris,
I know you have better things to worry about so I think I will just mark this as fixed and save you wasting time, unless you see any mileage in keeping it open.
Much appreciate the quick initial response and feedback.
Regards
Kevin
Ok, I think from what you’ve shown that things look reasonably OK. I’m not sure why the device wasn’t discovered properly initially - maybe the confusion with node numbers…
Anyway, I see someone has started a V1.10 version in the database - I’ve just added your XML to it so it would be good to check the parameters are consistent and then we can get it published.