rossko57
(Rossko57)
September 10, 2022, 4:41pm
8
It’s reasonable for OH core strategists to enforce standards. Of course that means that binding developers may or may not put the effort in to meet those standards.
You should look into the ‘marketplace’ which allows 3rd-party add-ons outside of core openHAB. Of course the developer then takes on support for their offering.
All,
As the queue for binding PRs is still too long at thus it has become a common practice to share JARs of unmerged bindings with other users on Github, there was the strong wish to have some easy mechanism to share such bindings.
Well, I am happy to announce that we now have an (early) version of such a mechanism in place: The Eclipse IoT Marketplace integration! Here are the details:
Eclipse IoT Marketplace
The Eclipse IoT Marketplace is a website, which allows people to exchange extensio…
Here’s an example of that going on in real time
Hello,
I’ve been using openHAB 1.8 with the UDP-Binding successfully. Now I’ve been trying to migrate to the current version of openHAB and get the UDP-Binding to work, to no avail.
This is my setup:
Windows 10
Zulu Java 11
openHAB 3.3.0
SmartHome/J TCP/UDP Binding 3.2.14
Documentation: https://docs.smarthomej.org/3.2.14/org.smarthomej.binding.tcpudp.html
The installation of the binding worked well, no errors.
The configuration was done completely textual:
The thing is configured to rece…