I will request edit rights through email and then upload the xml file I have.
Thanks
I will request edit rights through email and then upload the xml file I have.
Thanks
Itâs ok - Iâve found you in the system so will update your access in a few minutes⊠(sorry - didnât realise you didnât already have access).
Thank you. Now I just need to find {userdata}/zwave on Ubuntu server
Thank you for the help, Iâve submitted the XML that I have although I wasnât able to change the setting regarding SECURITY. According to the manual attached to that device it does support it.
Are you really sure that the device is securely included? In HABmin, is there a green tick next to the properties for security?
The XML doesnât show any information about security, and doesnât contain any of the command classes I would normally expect a lock to support (like the LOCK command class ).
The Vision lock has a different manufacturer number than the Monoprice, so they would need separate entries. But if you uploaded the XML, it probably is the Vision. The reference to Monoprice in the Vision db entry should probably be removed. I updated some of the command classes for you (had some other things to do in the db). The lock looks to support Association CC, but I didnât see anything on the number of nodes supported or group ID, so I left it out. Strange that the manual doesnât mention Association or some of the others. Some channels are still missing. Hope this helps!
@chris, something is funky with the db. I wasnât able to add a channel for Battery, and I didnât see this channel in any other devices (BE469, WADWAZ, WAPIR, etc.). Also, I updated to OH 2.3 snapshot 1212 and noticed that in both Habmin and PaperUI that the Association CC is missing from all of my devices. But I see it in the XMLs. Not sure if this was something new in 2.3.0.201802082157 and I hadnât noticed, or the upgrade somehow messed something up, or if thereâs something else going on specific to my system.
Thanks for responding! This is what it shows for me currently in HABmin:
@chris I can now confirm based on this screenshot it does not use security.
This is very interesting considering the numbers are all the same as the one pending in the database and that oneâs manual says it does support SECURE.
It looks like you need to exclude and reinclude (close to the controller) to try and get it securely included. Youâll see the green checkmark when you do.
If i let OH discover the âthingsâ, can i stillcreate the links and items in txt files?
Yes.
Switch FibFGS222_DoubleRelay1_1 { channel="zwave:device:15ca6a108b9:node36:switch_binary" }
First part is the item, second part in curly brackets is the channel linked to the thing.
Funky
You canât add battery channels - they magically (should!) add themselves when the BATTERY command class is found.
The database has a list of command classes that are considered âuserâ classes and only these classes can have channels added.
What do you mean by âAssociation CCâ? The command classes arenât listed anywhere I can think of - do you mean the association configuration parameters? If so I donât know why they would be treated any differently to any other parameter - HABmin and PaperUI donât have any specific handling for theseâŠ
Iâll take a look tonight.
ZWave devices will act differently depending on how they are included. Itâs still the same device, but because itâs not securely included, itâs not presenting the secure command classes. You need to reset it, and try another secure inclusion.
Really? Man⊠I thought all those stories about magical channels were just faerie tales! This whole time Iâve been thinking all channels needed to be manually added. Itâs all starting to make sense now! Maybe they could be a shimmery iridescent color, so we all know which ones are magical?!
Well⊠unless they are secret magicalâŠ
Yeah, the association configuration parameters for all my devices disappeared. This persists even after several OH restarts.
I bet youâre going to tell me now that these are magical tooâŠ
This seems to be evil magic! I canât see any reason why they wouldnât be there - everything looks fine with the definitions
So according to the code:
It should be "zwave_nodeid"
Alas, this still doesnât work.
Sorry, but this isnât correct - youâre not looking at the right code. This feature is only available in the development version and youâre not looking at that version. You need to use node_id
.
Please see the testing that was performed previously here -:
Hi @chris i read the writeup and its well done. Followed it perfectly.
Unfortunately, ânode_idâ didnt work. nor did ânodeidâ, âzwave_nodeidâ, âzwave_node_idâ. Also tried with and without quotes on the Number values (to make em strings and ints). Also tried upper and lower cases.
Iâm not sure why this is to be honest. node_id
is what the binding is looking for, and it certainly used to work. The binding doesnât know (or care) if this is specified in a file, or through the UI - it looks for node_id
in any case. Clearly from the binding perspective, this is working or the binding simply wouldnât work for anyone.
Iâll see if I can do a quick testâŠ
It seems to work fine for me.
I think this started after updating to snapshot 1212, and it doesnât seem like anyone else is reporting it. Iâll try my archived version. Very strange!