Switch state doesnt turn on for a ZWave Dimmer when the Dimmer is turned on

Fair enough - your earlier version of the same advice for reference (and the warning that switch_binary may be removed :wink:

Yes, and isnā€™t that saying the same thing as Iā€™ve been saying here?

2 Likes

I should also add that I donā€™t know what version of the device we are talking about here. I donā€™t know therefore if the device definition in the database has changed. Maybe a new version has been added with a different definition (there are 3 versions of this device in the database I think). Or maybe a channel was removed - Iā€™m just not sure at the moment, so I canā€™t say that it can be ā€œadded backā€ - it may not have been there and it may just be new definitions for an updated version of the device.

Working version ZW111 Aeotec Nano Dimmer (this version has worked since binding back in October 2019)

Not working version ZW111 Aeotec Nano Dimmer (this device was not known to ZWave prior to the update done in build #846)

I just checked github, and the only change that has been made to this device in the past couple of months was 5 days ago when an additional type/ID was added.

Prior to that, a change was made in early October to change one of the labels -:

Even the original version of this device from September doesnā€™t have the switch channel included -:

I donā€™t know what else I can do here - Iā€™ve spent a lot of time trying to help, and Iā€™m sorry that you donā€™t accept my answers. Iā€™ve tried to present the documentation and history that shows where the various features you claim the binding should implement are really meant to be implemented, and I appreciate that this is not accepted by you, but Iā€™m now at a bit of a loss as to what else to do. Maybe there was a new version added to the database that your system has swapped to using, but unfortunately I donā€™t have the time to continue to chase this one at the moment.

Fair enough, well I canā€™t explain how this is all working just fine then on my system with the Switch item bound to the Dimmer channel.

@Kai Are you able to comment on why a Switch item doesnt work in 2.4.0 Core for a ZWave device? It has a switch_dimmer channel, of which a dimmer itemtype and a switch itemtype is bound too. When the dimmer receives a command, such as 50, the switch item does NOT change to ON.

This is occuring on a 2.4.0 Stable system. It does not occur on another 2.4.0 Stable system I have with the identical Zwave device.

The only difference between the two is the physical hardware and the Zwave binding

Thanks!

I wonder if this may have to with your ā€œworkingā€ Things being created under a different/older binding version.

Then we cannot help you.
In my animated gif you can see how it works on a snapshot zwave binding with a Fibaro dimmer, my switch and dimmer items are bound to a switch_dimmer channel:

Switch FibFGD212_1_Sw (gRestore) { channel="zwave:device:uzb:node37:switch_dimmer1", autoupdate="false" }

Dimmer FibFGD212_1_Dim (gRestore) { channel="zwave:device:uzb:node37:switch_dimmer1", autoupdate="false" }

The switch turns on immediately after the dimmer percentage is set greater than zero.

That makes no sense. why should I have to upgrade to a non stable platform(2.5.0) to get a feature that works on 2.4.0?

Not following rossko57. What do you mean mate?

If it works on different platforms with both the stable 2.4 we cannot help you either because you are the only one who is able to find the differences between them.
Check your config, check your parameters (especially parameter 80)

understood Sihui! Thanks

Based on this, I presumed you had another system with ZW111 already configured and working as you expected. Those devices would necessarily have had their Things created under an older binding version.

Itā€™s not really clear if you actually do have other, older ZW111 or if they are different versions from your new one, or if you have tried the ā€œfailingā€ new one on your older ā€œworkingā€ system.

No mate, all ZW111s are the same.

I havent tried the new binding on the working system. I will do though!