I am using openHAB 2.5.11 on a Raspberry 4 with raspbian OS. I ran into an error when installing some software that requires port 1900 UDP (unifi controller) and found out that openHAB is using that port. I am not able to find out, what binding is causing this.
The bindings I use are: mqtt,astro,exec,fritzboxtr0641,kodi,weather1,wol1,network,systeminfo,tcp1
I have configured the tcp1 binding to listen on UDP 40001 and nothing else.
My research showed that UPNP uses UDP 1900 - is this an OH thing or is some binding using it? What logs could I enable to find out more?
I did the same and that’s how I found that OH is listening on that port. The question for me is what is causing this, do I need this and could I prevent it.
I have started poking around with a blank docker openhab image and it seems the issue is with hue & deconz binding. Setting the following in runtime.cfg did not help though
PORT STATE SERVICE
1900/udp open upnp
| upnp-info:
| 192.168.0.26
| Server: Linux/3.14.0 UPnP/1.0 IpBridge/1.26.0
|_ Location: http://192.168.0.26:8090/description.xml
MAC Address: 22:DD:55:00:EE:68 (Unknown)
In case you disabled e.g. deconz, hue and the port is still in use I would expect to get a different content then.
Are we talking about the same things or did I get something wrong? I know that openHab is listening on 1900 UDP, but would like to find out which binding. I already found out that a fresh openHAB does not listen on the port, but as soon as I add hue or deconz it does. Wouldn’t nmap output always look the same when openHAB is listening?
Nonetheless, here is the output I am getting from your command:
Starting Nmap 7.70 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2020-12-20 16:49 CET
Nmap scan report for localhost (127.0.0.1)
Host is up.
PORT STATE SERVICE
1900/udp open|filtered upnp
Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 8.04 seconds
OK, so there seems no way to find out which binding is using upnp besides trial&error. Also it seems that not all bindings regard the discovery.BINDING:background=false setting - I assume it is not mandatory or should I file an issue with the bindings?
Probably I can ignore this now, since I moved my installation to docker without host-networking so that I can decide to not forward port 1900/udp.