I guess there’s a couple of options when this happens -:
- We ignore it. If the database entry looks the same (ie has all the same command classes / channels, and config parameters as the database, then it’s just a naming thing. This does happen from time to time where the manufacturer packages the same device into different products, so could be the same here.
- We “delete” the existing device and create a new one and wait for someone to complain that their lamp module is gone. Not so nice, but we can then discuss between the parties how to handle it. Sometimes (not too often thankfully) manufacturers use the same device types for completely different devices (this is actually against the standards, but it does happen!). If the devices are totally different, then we can potentially handle this by using firmware version. If the firmware versions are also the same, then there’s not a lot we can do to differentiate the devices.
So… Please first take a look at the database for the lamp module to see if it looks the same, and we can decide from there where to take it…