Including the device was no issue, only there was one channel when I expected two channels to be there. The first channel is the dimmer (which works perfectly fine) and the second channel that I expected was a channel to measure the power consumption in watts. The manual of the device indicates that the device supports measuring power consumption (Verbruiksmeter in dutch). I’ve looked around the forum and found out that openhab generates an XML file for the zwave devices. I’ve looked it up and found indeed a COMMAND_CLASS_METER with a meterType of ELECTRIC and meterScale of E_KWh which indicates to me that it should be available.
I read that updates of zwave devices need to be done in a database and that the XML file is needed. Therefore I’ve attached the generated XML file. Is there somebody that can update the database with a channel for measuring the consumption?
I’ve had a look at the database and the sensor that was in it. But I’m not completely sure what the next step would be. When I look at the xml file and what is in the database, it seems that the version/manufacturer/product numbers etc are all the same. Only there are some command groups missing in the database that are visible in my xml file. Firmware is set to “all” in the database but when i look in to the pdf attached in the database, i can’t see the command class meter. So maybe it’s a firmware feature that has been added later, but I don’t know for sure.
It also says in the documentation of the database underneath updating existing devices that when the database was created it may not have contained all the detailed information for the device. That would be printed with a message in the summary page. I don’t see that message, which than would imply that what is in the database was all there was at that time.
I don’t have requested database modification access at this point (only an account) but would the next step then be (in this case) to select the update device option and update the xml file that I attached to the previous message? And then the firmware revision must be set to min what is in that xml file just to be sure that if there was a difference in firmware, it will be taken care of?
If you are able to follow up on that, that would be awesome. There’s no time pressure on it from my side, so whenever it’s convenient for you, would be awesome.
Good to hear that you found it. You’re saying that not all command classes have associated channels. I’m not completely sure what you try to say here. But would upload a the new xml file be the right step in this case?