ZWAVE--GE (Jasco) Wall Plug Dimmer ZW3104 is an Unknown Device

Add-ons Bindings
,
1

This dimmer has been working for a few years but is not longer recognized after upgrading to 3.4.0 M5 a few weeks ago. I replaced a failed Aeotec Gen5+ and decided to update the software at the same time from an earlier version, 3.1 I believe. All my devices were found and known except this one. I see that the device is still in the database. https://opensmarthouse.org/zwavedatabase/577 I’m looking for help getting the database updated if that is what is required.

This is what Openhab is reporting:

Label
Z-Wave Node 020 (0063:5044:3038:5.25)

zwave_class_basic
BASIC_TYPE_ROUTING_SLAVE
zwave_class_generic
GENERIC_TYPE_SWITCH_MULTILEVEL
zwave_frequent
false
zwave_neighbours
1
zwave_listening
true
zwave_version
5.25
zwave_plus_devicetype
NODE_TYPE_ZWAVEPLUS_NODE
zwave_deviceid
12344
zwave_nodeid
20
zwave_lastheal
2022-12-06T10:32:30Z
zwave_routing
true
zwave_plus_roletype
ROLE_TYPE_SLAVE_ALWAYS_ON
zwave_beaming
true
zwave_secure
false
zwave_class_specific
SPECIFIC_TYPE_POWER_SWITCH_MULTILEVEL
zwave_devicetype
20548
zwave_manufacturer
99

Thanks for any help. This is my first posting after quite a few years of using Openhab and I really appreciate all the hard work that’s gone into it.

2

grafik
grafik1174×474 22.1 KB

It was modified, but there is no request for review, so the device was removed from the binding …

Whoever modified it, should request a review.

Alternative:
Read

Check that the device definitions in the Z-Wave database are correct and request a review.

3

Thanks for the quick reply. That’s unfortunate though. I don’t think I’ll tackle updating the database for a single device but maybe whoever modified it will see this topic and chime in.

4

I looked in vain for when this was modified and it seems like a long time ago, so I just marked for review. I’m not sure of when the next DB update will be with the code freeze, but hopefully it will be back with the 3.4 release. It will not be in 3.4M6 (IMO)

5

Thanks for doing that. Do I need to attach .xml file for the review?

6

Here is the .xml. It looks like there are differences. The database shows no beaming or routing but they are true in the xml file. The database parameter “always listening” is “no”, the xml does not have that parameter but has “listening” true.

network_caf6b405__node_20.xml (9.3 KB)

7

That information is picked up “live” during the discovery process. It is not contained in the device XML that is exported into the binding. (see attached for what will be in the binding from the next DB extract- hopefully in about a week.)
28167_0_0.xml (7.2 KB)
However, I fixed it anyway as it is not correct

8

Thanks!

9

As is frequently the case :wink: I was wrong about this. I believe the device is in the M6 release (today). Give it a try if you wish.

10

It working now. Thanks again!