Zwave Zooz 800 Series Z-Wave Long Range USB Stick ZST39 LR

zwave 027A:0004:0610::0.0 not found in database. I believe it to be my
Zooz 800 Series Z-Wave Long Range USB Stick ZST39 LR.
I’d love to submit it to the database, alas the site for which I had a link to the database
https://opensmarthouse.org/zwavedatabase/ will not allow me to register. as the https://opensmarthouse.org/user/register.php returns file not found. Any suggestions?

Use the second link but with register-hidden.php instead of register.php

https://opensmarthouse.org/user/register-hidden.php

FYI- The controller should work even if it is not in the ZWDB.

Yes and no, The controller portion of the binding is sorely lacking in attributes and accuracy… Every controller alwayus claims to be nodeid 1 regardless of the reality. I have 3 controllers. The two AEOTECT 5 series sticks are nodes 1, 15 and 40 and show accurate node neighbor data when discovered as zwave nodes versus their entries as controllers. For that matter the nodes both show up via my ZST39 controller with nodeids 1, 15 and 40, but the controller thing for the ZST39 which is (as determined by other tools) node 5 cannot be recognized and initialized to get the more accurate zwave network data. In short, Chris did an awesome job writing this thing, but there’s holes and assumptions in the actual bridge portion that make it less useful sometimes…

When I developed the PR for SDK7.x controllers (those with 700 and 800 chips) I had to exclude the controller from finding its neighbors because they failed to complete. Since most often the controller is node 1, the defaults are set up that way, but some can be overridden via the advanced configuration or manually using the API explorer. A good assumption is if a node has a controller as a neighbor, that node is a neighbor of the controller too.

Ok so there is a way to change the lsted nodeID for the zwave:serial_zstick device insode openHAB, because I am not finding that?
Please understand I am not knocking the development work, I just happen to be encountering a brick wall in resolving this issue in my rather obnoxious setup. I know it’s a corner case, I just keep running up against the wall because the ZST39 is being sent commands and all the devices are reporting back to the actual Node1 and thus causing a general failure to communicate over that bridge. If I can update that nodeid in openhab for the controller to match it’s actual node id, I think it’d likely lead to a solution of the problem.

I did have a controller on Node 29 a while back, I recall I needed to change the node in the association group one for each device. Only cautions are that I only had one controller and most devices only allow one device in Group 1 most are default in the ZW DB as Controller. Going from memory, in the advanced tab for the Controller there is a parameter for SIS_node and that needs to be changed.


I know there can be secondary controllers but haven’t played around with that. As unwanted unsolicited advice I have split the home ZW into three zones, but each is on its own Rpi and connected either via Mqtt or remote OH binding (Rpi3b-Aeotec5, Rpi4-Zooz-ZSt10 and Rpi5-Zooz- ZST39)

Lastly when I first saw your post I was concerned about this issue. It has been addressed in the OH5.0 snapshots, but not yet in a stable version.