Hello:
I want to apply for an OH specification that can be listed on the webpage of Add-Ons .
As the warm suggestion of H102 in this post
we make a step by step tutorial about the wifi energy mete WEM3080 and WEM3080T.
we try to post here but found there is an limitation about the number of pics and links for new user.
So we post the md file in github.
I do not know whether it reach the quarlification of OH specification.
Thanks for your attention.
Regards
hi,thanks for your replying.
we have integrated the meter to Openhab using the http add-ons and make a step by step tutorial refer to existing document in https://www.openhab.org/addons/ .
we want to know if our tutorial can be added in the documents of add-ons too.
First of all, I think it is important to get the nomenclature correct. What is presented here is not a binding. Therefore it can not and should not be submitted as a binding. I’ve removed the openhab2-addons from the tags as well since it is not talking about a binding.
Secondly, the docs usually do not include tutorials for how to integrate with other devices or services using existing openHAB bindings like this. Those types of tutorials are kept here on the forum in the Tutorials & Examples: Solutions category (I’ve moved it).
This is an excellent tutorial and thank you for posting, but I do not think a PR is warranted. If you like, I think I have the power as a moderator to give you the permission to post more pictures and such if you’d rather have it on the forum instead of on github.
really appreicate for your detailed explaination.
I am so glad if you can give us the permission to post more link and pic in this post, and I will move the tutorial here.
By the way, is the forum support md format directly? Could we post the md file here?
There is another question,
As you describe, it is only a tutorial rather than a binding.
Becasue the existing http binding is just right for our meter`s api, so we used it directly .
if we build a new binding using the http protocal, implemented the basic auth and parameter handling in it, do you think we could apply for a new binding?
we just think that the content could be listed in add-ons of OpenHab is more formal and cool.