robmac
(R Macdonald)
April 27, 2021, 2:00pm
41
I noticed a couple of Fibaro devices that have out of range parameters. I thought it was a UI handling issue as they used to be correct but possibly now I see this it is wrong in the database. Is it possible a few were changed during migration?
If I can have access to the new database I will fix as I come across them.
It is doubtful that happened during migration.
I personally did not do the migration but worked on the backend scripts, primarily for creating new entries and for the device documentation that appears on the OH site.
shorty707
(Shorty707)
April 27, 2021, 2:18pm
43
This is true for many devices I have.
I think it is related to
opened 08:19PM - 01 Apr 21 UTC
bug
main ui
## The problem
It is currently not possible to control most Z-Wave and many Z… igbee devices, and possibly other bindings as well as the UI incorrectly renders configuration parameters that have options defined, and also allow other values to be specified (ie `LimitToOptions` is `false`).
@ghys stated on the forum -:
```
The combination of type: INTEGER, limitToOptions: false and options defined is not supported by the config parameter control at the moment.
```
https://community.openhab.org/t/zwave-oh3-config-parameters/119789/22
This is quite a major issue and affects around 875 ZWave things. I would suggest that if the control is not able to handle this for integers, that the UI instead renders a simple integer input both. This is probably better, but since the values defined in the options may be outside of the `min` and `max` values allowed for integers, it will still mean that some values cannot be defined. Often for example we may have an option `Disable` of (say) `255`, but the `min` and `max` are defined as `0` and `100` - so just rendering an integer input of `0 to 100` will still mean that the user cannot select 255.
Since “Options” are not correctly shown/handled on the UI. Those out of range values could possibly come from such a Option?
That was at least my interpretation why so many devices have this atm.
1 Like
sihui
(SiHui)
April 27, 2021, 2:53pm
45
Same here …
That was/is my assumption, too.
1 Like
Thanks. Sorry to bother you.
sihui
(SiHui)
April 27, 2021, 2:56pm
47
Bruce_Osborne:
Sorry to bother you.
No problem, I am still alive
1 Like
hi
is the problem with writing the parameters for zwave devices via the ui fixed? does anyone know? if so, from which version? thanks
robmac
(R Macdonald)
November 11, 2021, 9:57am
49