Fibaro Smart Implant FGBS-222

0user0 · October 3, 2019, 10:16am

I use only the input channel, I see correctly the state in the Basic UI.
I see the state with a switch icon, but I can active the switch by click, but are a inputs, there is a method for see a not clickable switch? Example a text item?
Thanks.

sihui · October 3, 2019, 10:45am

Sure, just change it to a text item which gives you ON/OFF without the switch action:

Text item=FGBS222Output1
Text item=FGBS222Output2

You may need a state format like [%s] in your sitemap or items definition.

sihui · October 4, 2019, 11:08am

0user0 · October 4, 2019, 7:57pm

Hi,
I tested to modify in .sitemaps file the Switch item in Text item and I see the text with OK or Alarm (why?). In the log I see change the input 1 OFF to ON and not OK to Alarm.
I read mappings function in the .sitemaps don’t work with text.
Can I change the text value in basic UI?
Thanks.

_David · October 6, 2019, 6:46pm

Hey Kennet,

did you mange to get your setup to work?
What you are describing is what I’m looking for:
Input 1 and Input 2 shoudl be completely independent from out 1 and out2.
In the fibaro manual there is written that in1 is linked to out1, same with in2 and out2.
I’m wondering if it is possible to use them independent from each other.

Thanks

_david

Bruce_Osborne · October 6, 2019, 6:54pm

Although the device has been added back to the master database, those changes have not yet been exported to GitHub so, of course, the latest snapshot does not yet have those changes.

Until the changes get published, these devices will not function properly with the latest snapshots.

_David · October 6, 2019, 7:08pm

So, I am on 2.5m3. Would you please that nice and tell me what functions are missing on 2.5 m3?

Thanks

Bruce_Osborne · October 6, 2019, 7:10pm

I am not sure if that device is missing in 2.5M3. @sihui or @chris should know for sure.
It removed during some periodic database maintenance.

Kennet · October 6, 2019, 7:16pm

Hi

Yes it is possible to get it to work however as Bruce says there is some issues currently. I am unsure exactly what versions it is working in. You need to enable the protection and This is not a “normal” zwave configuration option.

_David · October 6, 2019, 7:59pm

Thanks,

so just replacing the definition with this one:

https://www.cd-jackson.com/index.php/zwave/zwave-device-database/zwave-device-list/devicesummary/1005?layout=openhab2new

want be enough?

Thx

Bruce_Osborne · October 6, 2019, 8:01pm

The definitions are part of the binding.

_David · October 6, 2019, 8:16pm

As far as I understand the one I linked is a modified one and not identically to the on at the snapshot 2.5M3 release? If not, what else I do have to replace to get the local protection to work?

Thanks for your patience.

Bruce_Osborne · October 6, 2019, 8:20pm

The database is compiled into the binding.
Although UPgrading components of OH is supported in many cases, DOWNgrading is not supported.

_David · October 6, 2019, 8:41pm

Sry, I’m still confused. You wrote that the changes I’m asking for are not exported to github. According to Kennet, what I’m looking for is the local protection mode. And if I have a look at the master github of the zwave binding: with 18 th Aug the protection mode is available:

github.com

openhab/org.openhab.binding.zwave/blob/master/doc/fibaro/fgbs222_0_0.md

---
layout: documentation
title: FGBS222 - ZWave
---

{% include base.html %}

# FGBS222 Smart Implant
This describes the Z-Wave device *FGBS222*, manufactured by *[Fibargroup](http://www.fibaro.com/)* with the thing type UID of ```fibaro_fgbs222_00_000```.

The device is in the category of *Sensor*, defining Device used to measure something.

![FGBS222 product image](https://www.cd-jackson.com/zwave_device_uploads/1005/1005_default.jpg)


The FGBS222 supports routing. This allows the device to communicate using other routing enabled devices as intermediate routers.  This device is also able to participate in the routing of data between other devices in the mesh network.

## Overview

allows to enhance the functionality of wired sensors and other devices by adding Z-Wave network communication. You can connect binary sensors, analog sensors, DS18B20 temperature sensors or DHT22 humidity and temperature sensor to report their readings to the Z-Wave controller. It can also control devices by opening/closing output contacts independently of the inputs.

This file has been truncated. show original

So if I use he snapshot version the snapshot version should work as i expect?

Bruce_Osborne · October 6, 2019, 8:45pm

The experts told me to check GitHub here

.

oeiber · October 6, 2019, 8:47pm

When I try to send “2” to the local protection channel, I can see the following log entries:

22:45:05.419 [DEBUG] [nding.zwave.handler.ZWaveThingHandler] - NODE 33: Command received zwave:device:trm01:node33:protection_local5 --> 2 [DecimalType]
22:45:05.423 [DEBUG] [nding.zwave.handler.ZWaveThingHandler] - NODE 33: No messages returned from converter

Can anybody help?

_David · October 6, 2019, 8:53pm

Okay, if so back to my first suggestion: just put the definition file into the binding and my use case should work…
I guess that is what the others did, too…

Kennet · October 7, 2019, 5:29am

Yes that should work. You may need to create the Def file depending on what version you have.

0user0 · October 7, 2019, 10:31am

Hi,
For the local protections and RF protections, I see the settings in the channel of the zwave device with HABmin interface.
After, in the PaperUI I found in the control a multiple selections for configure the protections.
Is it correct configure the protection type in this method?

oeiber · October 7, 2019, 5:40pm

Seems protection is a secret which nobody wants to reveal